Ethical Decision Making

The courtship say involves Alex , a bookman of roentgen ray applied accomplishment who was having his graduation encounter with forbearings in the fatality room . As a savant , he was there to learn the techniques inborn in dealing with injured patients . His concern , therefore , was to school as much experience as he bunch learn from , following e rattling instruction give him by his instructor , Ms . Dubois . Ms . Dubois , on the different open , aside from macrocosm an instructor , was also the roentgenogram supervisory program of the hospital She was , therefore , performing a dual occasion and her responsibilities included teaching Alex the effective techniques in winning x-rays of emergency room patients while at the akin time sightedness to it that the task was being done aright - which means winn ing the x-rays without hurting or further injuring the patients . stave , the patient in question , Mr . Hanson , was seriously injured , plainly when he was mobile . He was in the hospital seeking relief of his embodied aches , not to be subjected to more surplus painsIf Alex succeeded in taking the x-rays of the head and neck of Mr Hanson on his first attempt , the plight should not have occurred Therefore , his being a student should not have mattered both . notwithstanding his lack of experience thrustd the patient great pain during the trine times that he manipulated the head and neck of Mr . Hanson to take the x-rays , full-grown rise to a dilemma : should the patient have been apprised that the one taking his x-rays was that a studentAccording to Beauchamp and Childress who were cited by Limentani , the billet of an devout commandment is , at best , star(predicate) facie This means that a pattern is only stuffing on all do unless it is in conflic t with equal or stronger duties In this cas! e study , therefore the principles of non-maleficence , beneficence , and autonomy have prima facie status . However , Ms .

Dubois clearly believed that the principles of non-maleficence and beneficence had been binding in this case so she chose not to inform the patient that Alex was only a student for fear that Mr . Hanson might flex uncorrectable and prevent them from taking the x-rays , thinking that a guiltless student might cause him more pain than obligatory . Since the x-rays were very important for his treatment , Ms . Dubois could be reassert in believing that Mr . Hanson should not be given any cause for anxiety and alarm which might turn him into a ill patient and make it impossible for them to take the x-ray (Limentani . 1999 ) some other justification for Ms . Dubois attain is the precept of Double exertion of Fowler Ariff (1987 ) referred to by Mosby (n .d , that any action that could service the patient , though painful , could be considered ethical if : the action itself is entire the performer intends only the good effect the prominent effect is not a means to a good end and a favorable balance exists between the good and bad set up Clearly , Ms . Dubois was only interested in component part Mr Hanson have the...If you indispensability to get a full essay, install it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay